The discrepancy between the dealer's and The Wall Street Journal's (and, supposedly, Honda's) recommendations struck me as odd. In addition, we often see recommendations around 60,000 miles for a timing belt change.
So, I did some digging in our database of car maintenance schedules and found that Honda does indeed recommend a timing belt replacement at 105,000 miles, but only for people following "normal" driving conditions. For those subjecting their cars to "severe" driving conditions, the interval is 60,000 miles. That's quite a difference in intervals.
Because there can be such a big difference in the recommended servicing intervals based on whether you follow a "normal" or "severe" schedule, it's pretty important to know which schedule is suitable for your car. This is especially important for a service item like the timing belt, because if the timing belt breaks it can result in very costly repairs. This type of preventive maintenance can therefore help avoid costly, preventable repairs.
Fortunately, we don't have to guess which schedule is suitable for our driving styles. The manufacturers themselves say that "severe" driving conditions include:
- Taking frequent short trips of 10 miles or less.
- Driving in cold weather.
- Driving in salty or dusty environments.
- Towing a trailer.
- Driving for extended periods at high speeds.
- Driving routinely in stop-and-go traffic.
- Driving with a car-top carrier.
Note: When you add your car to BrightCar Software, you'll be able to choose whether to load the "normal" or "severe" maintenance plan. We've got both plans in our database for nearly all U.S.-cars sold since 1983.
Further Note: We sent The Wall Street Journal an email pointing out the discrepancy between the normal and severe intervals, suggesting that maybe that dealer's recommendation wasn't so crazy after all, especially given the potential high cost of repairs, should the timing belt fail. Thereafter, the reader email and response were removed from their online version.
No comments:
Post a Comment